🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.